Ravi Govind Kamble v. State Of Maharashtra
Harish
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO.3225 OF 2025 HARISH VITHAL CHAUDHARI Ravi Govind Kamble .....Applicant Vs State Of Maharashtra .....Respondent by HARISH VITHAL CHAUDHARI Date:
2025.09.03 19:23:04 +0530 Adv. Harshavardhan B. Suryawanshi, for the Applicant. Mr. S. H. Yadav, APP for the Respondent-State. CORAM :
SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.
DATE :
26th AUGUST 2025 P.C.:
1.
By this application, the applicant is seeking regular bail in C.R.No. 572 of 2022 registered with Rajarampuri Police Station, Kolhapur, for the offences punishable under 302, 323, 143, 147, 148, 149, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Sections 4/25 of the Arms Act, 1959.
2.
It is the contention of the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant has been released on regular bail by this Court (Coram :- Anil S. Kilor J.) by order dated 16th July, 2024. While granting the bail, this Court had imposed the condition that the applicant shall attend the Trial Court
proceeding regularly. But due to some medical reasons, the applicant could not attend the Trial Court proceeding. Hence, the learned Trial Court issued Non Bailable Warrant (NBW) against the applicant and when the applicant filed an application for cancellation of NBW, the applicant was taken in MCR and thereafter, the learned Trial Court had rejected the bail application of the applicant. The applicant is ready to appear every date before the Trial Court. He has already been released on regular bail by this Court. Hence, requested to allow the application.
3.
It is the contention of learned APP that the allegations against the applicant are serious. The applicant has history sheeter and avoiding to face the trial. The order passed by the learned Trial Court is legal and valid and no interference is required in it. Hence, requested to reject the application. 4.
I have heard both learned counsel. Perused the impugned order and documents produced on record. Admittedly, the applicant has been released on regular bail by this Court. The applicant could not appear before the Trial Court due to medical reasons. The applicant is ready to appear before the Trial Court regularly. Considering the above facts, further
detention of the applicant is not required.
5.
In view of above, I pass the following order :
ORDER
(i) The application is allowed.
(ii) The applicant be enlarged on bail in C.R.No. 572 of 2022 registered with Rajarampuri Police Station, Dist: Kolhapur, on executing P. R. Bond in the sum of Rs.20,000/- with one or two sureties in the like amount.
(iii) The applicant shall attend the trial court proceeding regularly.
(iv) The applicant shall attend the police concerned police station as and when required. (v) The applicant shall inform his latest place of residence and mobile number immediately after being released and/or change of residence or mobile details, if any, from time to time to the Investigating Officer.
(vi) The applicant shall not tamper with the evidence or attempt to influence or contact the complainant, witnesses or any person concerned with the case.
6.
The application is allowed in the aforesaid terms and is accordingly disposed of.
7.
It is made clear that the above observations are made only for the purpose of granting bail and the Trial Court shall decide the case on its own merits in accordance with law and uninfluenced by the observations made in this order. 8.
All concerned to act on the authenticated copy of this order.
[SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.]