Tushar Siddharth Pawar v. The State Of Maharashtra

43-BA-3545-2025 (CR).doc S.S.Kilaje IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 3545 OF 2025 Tushar Siddharth Pawar ... Applicant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent _________________________________________________________________ Mr. Chetan Deshmukh, Advocate for the Applicant. Mr. P. P. Jadhav, APP for the Respondent-State. _________________________________________________________________ SONALI SATISH KILAJE by SONALI SATISH KILAJE Date:

2026.01.30 10:31:39 +0700

CORAM

: SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.

DATE : 28th JANUARY, 2026.

P.C. :

1.

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned APP for the State.

2.

Learned APP seeks time as concerned officer is not present. 3.

It is observed that in many matters the concerned officer or Investigating Officer remained absent. The applicant is behind bar around three years. The Commissioner of Police, Nashik shall remain present before this Court or through video conference on 05.02.2026. at 11:00 a.m.

4.

Stand over to 5th February, 2026. Learned APP to inform the Commissioner of Police, Nashik about his presence. (SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.)