Shaikh Mahmud Shaikh Mehboob @ Yakub Ganjawala v. State Of Maharashtra

28-BA-3595-2025 (CR).doc Rohit Ghuge IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION BAIL APPLICATION NO. 3595 OF 2025 Shaikh Mahmud Shaikh Mehboob @ Yakub Ganjawala

Versus

The State of Maharashtra _________________________________________________________________ Mr. Vipul Dushing a/w Mr. Tanmay Kate, Ajay Gawali, Shish Saxena i/b Shailesh Kharat, Advocate for Applicant.

Ms. Mahalaxmi Ganpathy, APP for Respondent-State. _________________________________________________________________

CORAM

: SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.

DATE : 16h FEBRUARY, 2026.

P.C. :

.

Heard learned counsel appearing for the Applicant, learned APP.

2.

Learned counsel for the Applicant submits that the Applicant is behind bars for more than eighteen months, yet charge has not been framed.

3.

Considering the submission of learned counsel for the applicant, call report from the concerned Judge as to why the charge is not framed against the applicant.

4.

The Registrar (Judicial-I) to communicate this order to the concerned Judge and call report from the concerned judge by next date. 5.

Stand over to 09th March, 2026.

(SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.)