Kashmira Sandip Pawar v. The State Of Maharashtra

97-BA-3698-2025 (CR).DOC Harish

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 3698 OF 2025 Kashmira Sandip Pawar ...Applicant

Versus

The State Of Maharashtra And Anr.

...Respondents

HARISH VITHAL CHAUDHARI ------- Mr. Sanjeev Kadam Senior Advocate a/w Mr. Aditya Raktade Advocate for the Applicant.

Mr. Abhishek Patil, Advocate for Respondent No. 2. Mr. S. S. Chaudhari, APP for the Respondent-State. by HARISH VITHAL CHAUDHARI Date:

2025.12.23 18:22:27 +0530 -------

CORAM

:

SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.

DATE :

19th DECEMBER, 2025 P.C.

1.

Heard learned senior counsel for the Applicant, learned APP for the Respondent State and learned counsel for Respondent No. 2. 2.

Learned APP seeks time to file affidavit-in-reply. 3.

Learned senior counsel for the Applicant strongly objected for adjournment on the ground that on several dates, the matter is adjourned on the request of learned APP.

4.

Considering the submission of learned senior counsel for the Applicant, last chance is given to the learned APP to file the affidavitin-reply. If learned APP failed to filed affidavit-in-reply on the next date, this Court would hear the matter on merit. 5.

Stand over to 9th January, 2026.

(SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.)