Jabbar Rajjaq Shaikh v. State Of Maharashtra And ANR

33-BA-3777-2025 (CR).doc Shubhada S Kadam IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION BAIL APPLICATION NO. 3777 OF 2025 Jabbar Rajjaq Shaikh

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and anr.

_________________________________________________________________ Mr. Mihir Kasliwal i/b. Mr. Rahul Kasliwal, Advocate for the Applicant. Mr. B.B. Kulkarni, APP for Respondent-State. Ms. Neelambika Deshmukh along with Mr. Prathamesh Gaikwad, Advocate for Respondent No.2.

_________________________________________________________________

CORAM

: SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.

DATE : 29th JANUARY, 2026.

P.C. :

1.

Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned APP for respondent No.1-State and learned counsel for respondent No.2. 2.

Learned counsel for respondent No.2 submits that the evidence of prosecution witness is over.

3.

Considering the submission of learned counsel for respondent No.2, I am not inclined to allow the application. As the trial is almost over, the applicant can file fresh bail application, if trial is not concluded within three months. The application stands disposed of. SHUBHADA SHANKAR KADAM (SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.) SHUBHADA SHANKAR KADAM Date: 2026.01.30 18:32:12 +0530