Pruthviraj Ankush Sakale And ANR v. The State Of Maharashtra

Prasad Rajput (P.A.) 502_4192_2025.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION BAIL APPLICATION NO.4192 OF 2025 Pruvthviraj Ankush Sakale & Anr.

...Applicants

Versus

State of Maharashtra

...Respondent

Mr. Sumit Patil i/by Amit Icham, for the Applicant. Ms. Megha S. Bajoria, APP for the Respondent - State.

CORAM

DR. NEELA GOKHALE, J.

DATED:

19TH NOVEMBER 2025 PC:- 1.

In the morning session, the present matter was mentioned as there was urgency, inasmuch as the Court was told that the Applicant is required to appear for examinations commencing from 13th November, 2025 to 28th November, 2025. The Applicants were desirous of appearing for the remaining papers and hence sought temporary bail urgently. 2.

Considering the urgency mentioned, the matter was listed on the Production Board this very afternoon. However, when the matter was taken on Production Board in the afternoon session, Mr. Patil, learned counsel for the 19th November 2025

Prasad Rajput (P.A.) 502_4192_2025.doc Applicants, states that he wished to argue the entire bail application on merits.

3.

In view of this submission, liberty to mention before the regular Court.

(DR. NEELA GOKHALE, J) 19th November 2025