Akshay Ram Gaikwad v. State Of Maharashtra

52-BA-4616-2025 (CR).doc Shubhada S Kadam IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION BAIL APPLICATION NO. 4616 OF 2025 Akshay Ram Gaikwad

Versus

The State of Maharashtra _________________________________________________________________ Mr. V. V. Dushing along with Mr Tanmay Kate, Advocate for the Applicant.

Mr. Prashant P. Jadhav, APP for Respondent-State. _________________________________________________________________

CORAM

: SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.

DATE : 23rd JANUARY, 2026.

P.C. :

1.

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned APP for respondent No.1-State.

2.

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is behind bar for more than five years, yet charge has not been framed. 3.

Considering the submission of learned counsel for the applicant, call report from the concerned Judge as to why the charge is not framed against the applicant though he is behind bar for more than five years. 4.

The Registrar (Judicial-I) to communicate this order to the SHUBHADA SHANKAR KADAM concerned Judge and call report from the concerned judge by next date. 5.

Stand over to 9th February 2026.

by SHUBHADA SHANKAR KADAM Date: 2026.01.27 17:03:02 +0530 (SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.)