Kishan Satish Aminswami v. State Of Maharashtra

5-BA-4666-2025.DOC Ajit Pathrikar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION BAIL APPLICATION NO. 4666 OF 2025 Kishan Satish Aminswami ...Applicant

Versus

State Of Maharashtra

...Respondent

Mr. S. R. Pille, for the Applicant.

Mr. Yogesh Y. Dabke, APP for the State-Respondent. PSI - Pramod Patil, Central Police Station, is present.

CORAM

DR. NEELA GOKHALE, J.

DATED:

16th DECEMBER 2025 PC:- 1.

After arguing the matter for some time, when I was not inclined to grant relief to the Applicant, Mr. S. R. Pille, learned Counsel for the Applicant, sought permission to withdraw the present Bail Application.

2.

Permission as sought is granted.

3.

Mr. Yogesh Dabke, learned APP, on instructions, states that the prosecution intends to examine only 15 to 20 witnesses and that the charges are already framed. 16th December 2025

5-BA-4666-2025.DOC 4.

In view of the statements made by Mr. Dabke, the Trial Court is requested to expedite the trial and conclude the same within a period of one year from the date of communication of this order to the Trial Court.

5.

In case there is no progress in the trial, the Applicant is at liberty to renew his application for bail. 6.

The Bail Application is accordingly disposed of. (Dr. Neela Gokhale, J) 16th December 2025