Baban Bharali Saikaya v. The State Of Maharashtra

105-BA-4667-2025 (CR).doc Shubhada S Kadam IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION BAIL APPLICATION NO. 4667 OF 2025 Baban Bharali Saikaya

Versus

The State of Maharashtra _________________________________________________________________ Mr. Vaibhav Chandanshive, Advocate for the Applicant. Mr. B. B. Kulkarni, APP for Respondent-State. _________________________________________________________________

CORAM

: SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.

DATE : 20th JANUARY, 2026.

P.C. :

1.

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned APP for respondent-State.

2.

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is behind bars for more than nine years. The applicant is the only one accused, yet trial is not over.

3.

Considering the submission of learned counsel for the applicant, call report from the concerned Judge as to why trial is not over though applicant is the only accused and he is behind bar for more than nine years.

4.

The Registrar (Judicial-I) to communicate this order to the concerned Judge and call report from the concerned judge by next date. 5.

Stand over to 4th February 2026.

Digitally signed by SHUBHADA SHANKAR KADAM Date:

2026.01.21 19:03:24 +0530 (SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.) SHUBHADA SHANKAR KADAM