Rahul @ Chandrashekhar Shivaji Rajguru v. The State Of Maharastra

47-BA-4671-2025 (CR).doc Shubhada S Kadam IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION BAIL APPLICATION NO.4671 of 2025 Rahul @ Chandrashekhar Shivaji Rajguru ... Applicant/s

Versus

The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent/s ____________________________________________________________ Mr. Aniket Nikam i/b. Mr. Sumit Patil i/b. Mr. Sumit Patil, Advocate for the Applicant/s.

Mr. Arfan Sait, APP for Respondent-State.

____________________________________________________________

CORAM

: SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.

DATE : 7th JANUARY, 2026.

P.C. :

1.

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned APP for respondent No.1-State.

2.

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is behind bar for more than two years, yet charge has not been framed.

3.

Considering the submission of learned counsel for the applicant, call report from the concerned Judge as to why the charge SHUBHADA SHANKAR KADAM is not framed against the applicant.

SHUBHADA SHANKAR KADAM Date: 2026.01.08 18:44:41 +0530

47-BA-4671-2025 (CR).doc Shubhada S Kadam 4.

The Registrar (Judicial-I) to communicate this order to the concerned Judge and call report from the concerned judge by next date.

5.

Stand over to 20th January 2026.

(SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.)