Chetan @ Pandya Bhausaheb Falke v. State Of Maharashtra

12-BA-4902-2025 (CR).doc Tikam IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 4902 OF 2025 Chetan @ Pandya Bhausaheb Falke

VERSUS

State Of Maharashtra WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 892 OF 2026 VAISHALI ANIL TIKAM IN BA/4902/2025 by VAISHALI ANIL TIKAM Date:

2026.04.21 14:37:29 +0530 Vikrant Rajendra Phalke

VERSUS

The State Of Maharashtra _________________________________________________________________ Ms. Sana Khan a/w. Vipul Dushing, Advocate for Applicant. Ms. G.S. Rao, APP for Respondent-State.

API Balaji Kamble, Paud Police Station, Pune Rural present. _________________________________________________________________

CORAM

: SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.

DATE : 16th APRIL, 2026.

P.C. :

1.

Heard learned counsel for the Applicant and learned APP for the State.

2.

Learned APP submits that the advocate for intervenor has filed leave note and requested for adjournment.

3.

As a matter is kept for orders, so presence of the intervenor is not required.

4.

As a last chance, stand over to 06/05/2026.

12-BA-4902-2025 (CR).doc Tikam (SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.)