Jauwan Nikkaram Singh And ANR v. State Of Maharashtra

11-ABA-20-2025.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 20 OF 2025 Jauwan Nikkaram Singh And Anr.

...Applicants

Versus

The State of Maharashtra

...Respondent

....

Mr. Krutik Veera h/f Mr. Gaurav Parkar, Advocate for the Applicants.

Mr. Tanveer Khan, A.P.P. for the Respondent - State. Mr. Mahendra Gawade (P.S.I.) Boisar Police Station, present. ....

CORAM

:

N. R. BORKAR, J.

DATE :

3rd FEBRUARY, 2025.

P.C.

:

1.

By order dated 9th January 2025 this Court had granted leave to implead the first informant as party respondent to the present application and directed that amendment shall be carried out forthwith. By the same order this Court had issued notice to the first informant and granted protection to the present applicants from arrest. 2.

The learned counsel for the applicants submits that due to inadvertence, the necessary amendment could not be Digitally signed by SAJAKALI LIYAKAT JAMADAR Date:

2025.02.03 19:27:17 +0530 carried out on that date. However, it is not understood as to SAJAKALI LIYAKAT JAMADAR Sajakali Jamadar

11-ABA-20-2025.doc why the matter was not moved thereafter before this Court seeking permission to carry out the amendment as the returnable date was after 18 days. I am therefore constrained to vacate the interim order dated 9th January 2025. The said interim order stands vacated.

3.

Amendment to be carried out within two days from today. If the said compliance is done, the registry shall issue notice to the First Informant, returnable on 12th February, 2025.

4.

In addition to Court notice, the Investigating Officer shall intimate about filing of the present application and the next date of hearing to the First Informant/Respondent No.2. (N. R. BORKAR, J.) Sajakali Jamadar