Chandrakant Ramchandra Sanglikar v. State Of Maharashtra

912-ABA-41-2025.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 41 OF 2025 Chandrakant Ramchandra Sanglikar ...Applicant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra

...Respondent

....

Mr. Ajay Jaiswal a/w Mr. Advait Shukla, Mr. Akshay Mishra, Advocate for the Applicant.

Mr. Sandip Barve, for the complainant.

Smt. Veera Shinde, A.P.P. for the Respondent - State. ....

CORAM

:

N. R. BORKAR, J.

DATE :

09th JANUARY, 2025.

P.C.

:

1.

The learned counsel Mr. Sandip Barve submits that he has instructions to file intervention application on behalf of the complainant and seeks time.

2.

At his request, list the application on 24th January, 2025.

3.

The learned counsel for the applicant submits, dispute if any between the parties is of civil nature and therefore till next date, the applicant be protected from arrest. Digitally signed by SAJAKALI LIYAKAT JAMADAR Date:

2025.01.10 12:49:08 +0530 SAJAKALI LIYAKAT JAMADAR Sajakali Jamadar

912-ABA-41-2025.doc 4.

Prima facie there appears to be no need of custodial interrogation. In that view of the matter, till the next date, the applicant shall not be arrested.

(N. R. BORKAR, J.) Sajakali Jamadar