Chandrakant Ramchandra Sanglikar v. State Of Maharashtra

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.41 OF 2025 Chandrakant Ramchandra Sanglikar ...Applicant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra

...Respondent

WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.1335 OF 2025 IN ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.41 OF 2025 Janlok Pratishtan through Sunanda Kadam ...Applicant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra

...Respondent

WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.398 OF 2025 IN ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.41 OF 2025 Dipak Asaram Palaskar ...Applicant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra

...Respondent

Mr. Ajay Jaiswal, for the Applicant in ABA/41/2025. Ms. R. V. Newton, APP, for the Respondent-State. Mr. Mayur Mohite a/w. Mr. Jayesh Bhosale and Mr. Deepak Jain, for the Intervenors.

Ms. Sankhe, PSI, EOW, Pune City, Pune, present.

CORAM:

MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.

DATED :

23rd FEBRUARY 2026 PC:- 1.

Ms. Newton, learned APP submits that there are antecedents against the Applicant and the same are not disclosed in the

Anticipatory Bail Application. She tenders the chart showing the details of the antecedents against the Applicant, which are as follows:

Sr.

No.

C.R. No. and Name of Police Sections Invoked Station

1. C.R. No.722 of 2024 Lonikand Police Station 420, 406, 34 of the Indian Penal Code,

2. C.R. No.80/2022 Varthur Police Station, Bangalore City 120(B), 149, 419, 420, 465, 471 and 468 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.

3. C.R. No.81 of 2022 Varthur Police Station, Bangalore City 120, 149, 419, 420, 465, 471 and 468 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.

4. C.R. No.82 of 2022 Varthur Police Station, Bangalore City 120(B), 149, 419, 420, 465, 471 and 468 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.

5. C.R. No.475 of 2025 Pimpri Chinchwad Police Station, Pune.

409, 420, 419, 465, 467, 468, 471 and 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.

2.

In view of the said contentions raised by Ms. Newton, learned APP, Mr. Ajay Jaiswal, learned Counsel appearing for the Applicant seeks leave to withdraw the Anticipatory Bail Application with liberty to file fresh Anticipatory Bail Application giving all the details of the antecedents.

3.

Accordingly, the Anticipatory Bail Application is allowed to be withdrawn and disposed of with liberty to file fresh Anticipatory Bail Application giving all the details of the antecedents. 4.

In view of the disposal of the Anticipatory Bail Application, nothing survives in the Interim Applications and the same are also disposed of.

5.

However, Mr. Jaiswal, learned Counsel appearing for the Applicant submits that although the Applicant is in custody in C.R. No.475 of 2025, in this Anticipatory Bail Application, there is interim protection and the same be continued for a reasonable period.

6.

Accordingly, the interim protection which is operating in Anticipatory Bail Application No.41 of 2025, shall remain in operation till 9th March 2026.

[MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.] Digitally signed by SONALI MILIND PATIL Date:

2026.02.24 10:34:37 +0530 SONALI MILIND PATIL