← Library
Bombay High CourtABA/102/2025rejected

Pavan Chandrakant Pawar And ANR v. State Of Maharashtra

2025-02-12Hon'Ble Shri Justice Rajesh S. Patil1 pages

904-ABA-102-2025.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.102 OF 2025 Pavan Chandrakant Pawar And Anr ...Applicants

Versus

State Of Maharashtra

...Respondent

____________________________________ Adv. Sandeep Shinde i/b. Chetan Deshmukh, Advocate for the Applicants.

Mr. Amit Palkar, APP for the State.

Adv. Ramesh Dube Patil a/w. Iraa Dule Patil i/b. Jay & Co., Advocate for the Original Complainant.

____________________________________

CORAM

: RAJESH S. PATIL, J.

DATED : 12 FEBRUARY 2025 P.C.:

1.

Mr. Shinde, the learned Advocate for the Applicants seeks liberty to amend the Anticipatory Bail Application and add first informant as party Respondent No.2. Liberty is granted, as prayed for. 2.

Amendment to be carried out forthwith 3.

Stand over to 13 February 2025.

(RAJESH S. PATIL, J.) Amol D. Nawale