Radheshyam Hariram Prajapati v. The State Of Maharashtra

603 ABA 154.25.DOC

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.154 OF 2025 Radheshyam Hariram Prajapati ...Applicant

Versus

State of Maharashtra & Anr.

...Respondents

Mr. Ranjeet M. Pawar, Advocate for Applicant. Ms. R.V. Newton, APP for State.

PSI, Mr. Sagar Mane, Yavat Police Station, Pune Rural, present.

CORAM:

MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.

DATED :

20th January 2026 P.C.:

1.

At the outset, Ms. Newton, learned APP submits that there are six antecedents against the Applicant which are not mentioned in the Anticipatory Bail Application.

2.

In view of said contention raised by Ms. Newton, learned APP, Mr. Pawar, learned Counsel for the Applicant, on instructions of the Applicant, seeks withdrawal of the Anticipatory Bail Application with liberty to file fresh Anticipatory Bail Application. He only submits that as the interim protection is granted by a learned Single Judge by Order dated 20th January 2025, the same be continued for a period of two weeks.

Dusane

603 ABA 154.25.DOC 3.

Accordingly, Anticipatory Bail Application is allowed to be withdrawn and disposed of as such, with liberty as sought. 4.

Ad-interim protection granted by Order dated 20th January 2025 shall remain in operation till 3rd February 2026. (MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.) Dusane