Vicky Ramdas Tambe v. State Of Maharashtra

906.ABA.165.2025+907.ABA.166.2025.doc HARSHADA H. SAWANT (P.A.) IN IN THE THE HIGH HIGH COURT COURT OF OF JUDICATURE JUDICATURE AT AT BOMBAY BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.165 OF 2025 Subhash Babu Arote .. Applicant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent WITH ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.166 OF 2025 Vicky Ramdas Tambe .. Applicant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent ....................

 Mr. Gautam Pyarelal, Advocate for Applicant in Anticipatory Bail Application No.165 of 2025 and Anticipatory Bail Application No.166 of 2025.

 Ms. Mahalakshmi Ganpathy, APP for Respondent - State of Maharashtra in Anticipatory Bail Application No.165 of 2025 and Anticipatory Bail Application No.166 of 2025.  Mr. Nitesh Gopichand Raulkar, Advocate for First Informant.  Mr. Prashant Jadhav, API, Kalwa Police Station, Thane City. ...................

CORAM

: MILIND N. JADHAV, J.

DATE : JANUARY 23, 2025 P.C.

:

1.

Heard Mr. Pyarelal, learned Advocate for Applicant in Anticipatory Bail Application No.165 of 2025 and Anticipatory Bail Application No.166 of 2025; Ms. Ganpathy, learned APP for Respondent - State of Maharashtra in Anticipatory Bail Application No.165 of 2025 and Anticipatory Bail Application No.166 of 2025 and Mr. Raulkar, learned Advocate for First Informant.

906.ABA.165.2025+907.ABA.166.2025.doc 2.

These Applications are under Section 438 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short 'Cr.P.C.') seeking Anticipatory Bail in connection with C.R. No.1525 of 2024 registered with Kalwa Police Station, Thane under Sections 307, 326, 420, 506(2), 504 and 34 of Indian Penal Code, 1860.

3.

After I heard Mr. Pyarelal, learned Advocate for Applicants; Ms. Ganpathy, learned APP, as also, Mr. Raulkar, learned Advocate for First Informant and after perusing the record, I expressed my mind to Mr. Pyarelal, learned Advocate for Applicants that I will not be inclined to grant the Applications in the facts of the present case, Mr. Pyarelal, learned Advocate after taking appropriate instructions has persuaded me to permit the Applicants to withdraw the Applications. 4.

Bail Applications are dismissed as withdrawn. H. H. SAWANT [ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ] HARSHADA HANUMANT SAWANT Date: 2025.01.23 14:06:18 +0530 HARSHADA HANUMANT SAWANT