Sushil S/O Gangadhar Surjuse v. The State Of Maharashtra Thr Pso Katol Dist Nagpur

2026:BHC-NAG:5124 77 aba102.26.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.

CRIMINAL APPLICATION (ABA) NO.201 OF 2026 Sushil s/o Gangadhar Surjuse Vs.

State of Maharashtra, through PSO, PS, Katol, District Nagpur __________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's orders.

and Registrar's Orders.

Shri Pranay Atkare, Adv. h/f Shri S.G. Karmarkar, Adv. for applicant. Shri N.S. Autkar, AGP / APP for respondent/State. CORAM : M.W. CHANDWANI, J.

DATE : 01.04.2026.

1.

The applicant is apprehending his arrest in connection with Crime No.732/2025 registered with Police Station, Katol, District Nagpur for the offences punishable under Sections 406, 409, 420 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

2.

Heard the learned counsel for the applicant as well as the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the nonapplicant/ State. Perused the case diary. 3.

Perusal of the case diary reveals that the applicant was working as collecting agent of a bank named Bharat Financial Inclusion Co. Ltd. The allegation against the applicant is that he collected the amount of 1,12,821/-from ₹ the members of the Bachat Gat but did not deposit the same with Bharat Financial Inclusion Co.Ltd. Therefore, on the complaint of the Branch Manager, the aforesaid offence

77 aba102.26.odt came to be registered against the present applicant and other co-accused persons.

4.

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is ready to deposit the amount of 1,12,821/- with ₹ Bharat Financial Inclusion Co. Ltd within a week from today to show his bonafide. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for non-applicant/State submits that if the applicant deposits the amount, there is no need of his custodial interrogation. 5.

It appears that crucial documents are already seized in this crime. The applicant was protected by ad interim order dated 17.03.2026 and accordingly, he attended the concerned police station and cooperated with the investigating agency. The applicant is ready to deposit the amount of 1,12,821/- which is allegedly embezzled by him. ₹ Considering these facts and submission of learned APP that no custodial interrogation of the applicant is required, a case is made out for confirmation of the interim order dated 17.03.2026. Accordingly, the application is allowed and disposed of. The interim order dated 17.03.2026 is confirmed on the same terms and conditions.

6.

List this matter on 08.04.2026 for compliance of the statement made by the learned counsel for the applicant about depositing the amount of 1,12,821/- with the bank. ₹ (M.W. Chandwani, J.) Wagh