Siddharth Kumar Singh v. State Of Maharashtra

Diksha Rane 918 ABA 294-2025.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 294/2025 SIDDHARTH KUMAR SINGH ..APPLICANT VS.

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ANR.

..RESPONDENTS ------------ Mr. Visshaal Khetre for applicant.

Mr. Ajay S. Patil, APP for State.

------------ CORAM : RAJESH S. PATIL, J.

DATE : APRIL 25, 2025.

P.C. :

1.

The offence punishable under Section 498-A of the Indian Penal Code has been registered in the crime. Hence, I am of the view of that the informant (wife) should be added as party respondent no.2 in the present proceeding.

2.

The applicant is directed to add the informant (wife) as party respondent no.2 in the present proceeding. Amendment to be carried out forthwith. If the amendment is not carried, the anticipatory bail application stands dismissed without reference to this Court. The learned APP to serve the amended copy of the anticipatory bail application to the newly added respondent no.2 through IO.

Diksha Rane 918 ABA 294-2025.doc 3.

Issue notice to the respondent no.2, returnable on 5/5/2025. (RAJESH S. PATIL, J.)