Sunil Shivaji Aher And ANR v. State Of Maharashtra

Diksha Rane 12. ABA 299-25.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 299/2025 SUNIL SHIVAJI AHER & ANR.

..APPLICANTS VS.

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ..RESPONDENT ------------ Mr. Pratik Kalantri for the applicants.

Mr. Anand S. Shalgaonkar, APP for the State.

Mr. Kuldeep Nikam for intervener/first informant. ------------ CORAM : RAJESH S. PATIL, J.

DATE : FEBRUARY 3, 2025.

P.C. :

1.

The learned counsel appearing for the first informant submits that he seeks to intervene in this matter and, therefore, requests that the first informant be added as a party respondent no.2. 2.

The learned APP appearing for the State submits that the first informant can be added as a party respondent no.2. 3.

The applicants are directed to add the first informant as a party respondent no.2. Amendment to be carried out forthwith. 4.

The copy of the present proceedings be served on the learned counsel for the newly added respondent no.2 during the course of the day.

Diksha Rane 12. ABA 299-25.doc 5.

The reasoned order is not annexed to the present matter. The copy of the same is handed over to me by the learned counsel appearing for the applicants.

6.

The learned APP also submits that they need to check and see the CCTV Footage in order to understand the role of the applicants. 7.

In order to permit the learned APP to make submissions after going through the CCTV footage, the matter is adjourned to 6/2/2025.

(RAJESH S. PATIL, J.) Signed by: Diksha Rane Designation: PS To Honourable Judge Date: 03/02/2025 19:18:58