Rohan Shankar Nikam v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR

Diksha Rane 1. aba 464-25.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 464/2025 ROHAN SHANKAR NIKAM ..APPLICANT VS.

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ANR.

..RESPONDENTS ------------ Adv. Prashant Raul a/w. Adv. Ganesh Pawar for applicant. Mr. Avinash A. Naik, APP for State.

------------ CORAM : RAJESH S. PATIL, J.

DATE : FEBRUARY 28, 2025.

P.C. :

1.

The learned counsel for the applicant submits that all offences attracted in the present First Information Report are under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita except the offence under POCSO. The anticipatory bail application was rejected by the Sessions Court. He submits that by the next date, the applicant will give the details of two wheeler on which the applicant was travelling and also the details of the educational background and his earlier antecedents. He will also inform the occupation if any is done by the applicant and also of his parents. He will also give details about the financial condition of the applicant including all the assets owned by him and his parents.

Diksha Rane 1. aba 464-25.doc 2.

Since the section of POCSO is invoked, issue notice to the respondents, returnable on 10/3/2025. The learned APP waives service on behalf of the respondent No.1. The learned APP to serve the copy of the anticipatory bail application on respondent no.2 through I.O.

(RAJESH S. PATIL, J.) Signed by: Diksha Rane Designation: PS To Honourable Judge Date: 28/02/2025 16:49:19