Jagdeep Singh Angrej Singh Sandhu v. The State Of Maharashtra, Thr. Pso, Ps, Panchpaoli, Nagpur (City), Dist. Nagpur

KVM 1/2 907 - ABA 598 OF 2025.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

by KANCHAN VINOD MAYEKAR Date: 2025.03.07 18:58:58 +0530 KANCHAN VINOD MAYEKAR CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 598 OF 2025 Rahul Govind Dudhal ..... Applicant

VERSUS

State of Maharashtra ..... Respondent Mr. Amit Icham for the Applicant.

Mr. Avinash A. Naik, A.P.P. for the State.

CORAM : RAJESH S. PATIL, J.

DATE : 7th MARCH,2025 P.C. :- Mr. Icham, learned counsel appearing for the applicant submits that in the present proceedings, the crime is registered for the offences punishable under Sections 363, 366 read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code. He submits that the victim has married with the present applicant and she has attended the age of majority. The victim has filed the consent affidavit.

2.

The applicant is directed to add the victim as a party respondent no.2. Amendment to be carried out forthwith. The name of the respondent no.2 be masked.

KVM 2/2 907 - ABA 598 OF 2025.doc 3.

The learned A.P.P. to serve the copy of these proceedings on the newly added respondent no.2 through the Investigating Officer. 4.

Stand over to 21st March, 2025.

5.

In the meanwhile, no coercive steps be taken against the applicant.

6.

The applicant is directed to attend the office of the Investigating Officer of the concerned police station in order to record the statement for further investigation on 13th March, 2025 and 15th March, 2025 between 11:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m.

[RAJESH S. PATIL, J.]