Farida Iqbal Sayed And ORS v. The State Of Maharashtra

Diksha Rane 923 ABA 712-2025.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 712/2025 FARIDA IQBAL SAYED AND ORS ..APPLICANTS VS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ..RESPONDENT ------------ Mr. Aniket Vagal for the applicants Ms. Supriya Kak, APP for State.

Mr. Faizaz Khan i/b. Mr. Akram Kapoor for informant. WPI Jyoti Hibare, Santacruz Police Station.

------------ CORAM : RAJESH S. PATIL, J.

DATE : MARCH 12, 2025.

P.C. :

1.

The learned APP states that the copy of the anticipatory bail application has not been served on the State. She submits that the IO also requires that the complainant should attend the office of the IO in order to help the IO in identifying the people who are seen in the video clip of the incident.

2.

The learned counsel appearing for the applicants seeks liberty to add the informant as party respondent no.2 in the present proceeding.

3.

Liberty as prayed for granted. Amendment to be carried out

Diksha Rane 923 ABA 712-2025.doc forthwith. If the amendment is not carried, the anticipatory bail application stands dismissed without reference to this Court. 4.

Stand over to 19/3/2025 under the caption "for urgent circulation".

(RAJESH S. PATIL, J.) Signed by: Diksha Rane Designation: PS To Honourable Judge Date: 12/03/2025 20:55:11