Jitendra Dnyaneshwar Marathe v. State Of Maharashtra

Diksha Rane 42 ABA 725-2025.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 725/2025 JITENDRA DNYANESHWAR MARATHE ..APPLICANT VS STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ..RESPONDENT ------------ Adv. Ramanik Pawar a/w. Adv. Arti Bajpai for applicant. Ms. P. N. Dabholkar, APP for State.

PSI Ramesh Taware, Kagal Police Station.

------------ CORAM : RAJESH S. PATIL, J.

DATE : MARCH 17, 2025.

P.C. :

1.

The learned counsel for the applicant submits that the offence punishable under the POCSO Act has been added in the FIR, therefore, he seeks liberty to add the informant/victim as party respondent no.2.

2.

Liberty as prayed for granted. Amendment to be carried out forthwith. If the amendment is not carried, the anticipatory bail application stands dismissed without reference to this Court. The learned APP to serve the amended copy of the anticipatory bail

Diksha Rane 42 ABA 725-2025.doc application to the informant through IO.

3.

Stand over to 20/3/2025.

(RAJESH S. PATIL, J.) Signed by: Diksha Rane Designation: PS To Honourable Judge Date: 17/03/2025 20:51:54