Prashant Murlidhar Koratkar v. State Of Maharashtra And ANR

2025:BHC-AS:13567 Diksha Rane 73. ABA 794-2025.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 794/2025 PRASHANT MURLIDHAR KORATKAR ..APPLICANT VS STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR ..RESPONDENTS WITH INTERIM APPLICATION ST. NO. 6492/2025 (NOT ON BOARD) ------------ Adv. Saurabh Ghag a/w. Adv. Divya Bhatra, Adv. Ganesh Gilbile, Adv. Siddharth Jadhav, Adv. Nikita Chavan, Adv. Siddhant Raul, Adv.Gopal Sarang, Adv. Dakshata Sawant, Adv. Prashant Mishra for applicant. Mr. Ajay S. Patil, APP for State.

Adv. A. S. Gaikwad a/w. Adv. A. R. Rote for intervener in IAST/6492/2025.

PSI Mahesh Pati and PSI Santosh Galave.

------------ CORAM : RAJESH S. PATIL, J.

DATE : MARCH 24, 2025.

P.C. :

1.

The learned APP submits that the present anticipatory bail application has become infructuous as the applicant herein has been arrested somewhere in Telangana.

2.

The learned counsel for the applicant submits that he has no instructions as regards the arrest of the applicant. 3.

Since the learned APP made submissions on instructions of the

Diksha Rane 73. ABA 794-2025.doc IO, the present anticipatory bail application is now become infructuous.

4.

The present anticipatory bail application is disposed of as infructuous.

5.

In view of the disposal of the anticipatory bail application, the interim application, if any, is also disposed of. (RAJESH S. PATIL, J.)