Umar Babu Sayyed And ORS v. The State Of Maharashtra

KVM 1/2 927 - ABA 805 OF 2025.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

KANCHAN VINOD MAYEKAR by KANCHAN VINOD MAYEKAR Date: 2025.03.29 16:08:20 +0530 CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 805 OF 2025 Umar Babu Sayyed & Ors.

..... Applicants

VERSUS

State of Maharashtra ..... Respondent ALONGWITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1244 OF 2025 IN ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 805 OF 2025 Narindersingh Rajindersingh ..... Intervener

IN THE MATTER BETWEEN

Umar Babu Sayyed & Ors.

..... Applicants

VERSUS

State of Maharashtra ..... Respondent Mr.Khwaja Shaikh for the Applicants.

Mr. Anand S. Shalgaonkar, A.P.P. for the State. Mr.Sudeep Pasbola, Senior Advocate a/w. Mr.Swapnil Wagh, Ms.Mamta Tiwari, Mr.Chinmay Godse for the Intervener. CORAM : RAJESH S. PATIL, J.

DATE : 28th MARCH, 2025 P.C. :- INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1244 OF 2025 1.

Heard. The applicants/accused does not oppose this

KVM 2/2 927 - ABA 805 OF 2025.doc interim application.

2.

In view of the law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Jagjeet Singh & Ors. vs. Ashish Mishra @Monu & Anr., in Criminal Appeal No. 632 of 2022, wherein it is held that a victim is entitled to be heard during adjudication of bail application of the accused.

2.

Hence, the interim application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a).

3.

Amendment to be carried out forthwith. The amended copy of the anticipatory bail application be served on the other side.

4.

In view of the above, this interim application is disposed of. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 805 OF 2025 Stand over to 2nd April, 2025.

[RAJESH S. PATIL, J.]