Sandip Vitthal Muppidwar v. State Of Maharashtra Thr Pso, Ps Pandharkawada Tq. Pandharkawada Dist. Yavatmal

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Shrikant Vithoba Alekari ... Applicant versus The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent Interim Application No. 775 of 2025 in Digitally signed by MAMTA AMAR KALE Date:

2025.06.19 18:01:05 +0530 MAMTA AMAR KALE Rajendra Khashaba Mahind ... Applicant In the matter between Shrikant Vithoba Alekari ... Applicant versus The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent Sarjerao Somnath Lokare ... Applicant versus The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent Interim Application No. 1842 of 2025 in Ramesh Shivaji Salunkhe ... Applicant

In the matter between Sarjerao Somnath Lokare ... Applicant versus The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent ---- Mr Ravindranath Patil a/w Ms Karishma Thakur a/w Mr Sharad R Dhore, for the Applicant in ABA/156/2025.

Mr Sadanand Bansode, for the Applicant in ABA/843/2025. Mr Ravi Kadam, for the Intervenor in both ABAs. Mr Pankaj Deokar, APP, for Respondent / State. ---- Coram: R.N. Laddha, J.

Date: 19 June 2025 P.C.:

Interim Application No. 775 of 2025 in Interim Application No. 1842 of 2025 in .

Heard.

2.

For the reasons stated in the intervention applications, no objection from the other side and in the interest of justice, the same are allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). 3.

The interim applications stand disposed of accordingly.

.

Heard.

2.

The applicants to implead the intervenors as a party respondent to these applications. Necessary amendments shall be carried out within one week from today.

3.

By consent, stand over to 15 July 2025.

(R.N. Laddha, J.)