← Library
Bombay High CourtABA/869/2025rejected

Kapil S/O Waman Dambhare v. State Of Maharashtra Thr Pso, Umred Nagpur

2025-11-19Hon'Ble Mrs. Justice Vrushali V. Joshi3 pages

1 6.aba.869.25

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CRIMINAL APPLICATION (ABA) NO. 869/2025 Kapil s/o. Waman Dambhare Vs. State of Maharashtra - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mr. M. V. Rai, Advocate for the Applicant.

Mr. V. A. Thakare, A.P.P. for the Non-applicant/State. CORAM : MRS.VRUSHALI V. JOSHI,J.

DATED : 19/11/2025.

.

Heard.

2.

Issue notice to the non-applicant, returnable on 03.12.2025.

3.

The learned A.P.P. waives service of notice for non-applicant/State.

4.

The applicant has apprehension of arrest in Crime No.588/2025 registered with Police Station Umred, District Nagpur for the offences punishable under Sections 406, 420 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. 5.

The applicant along with the other co-accused duped the complainant namely Manohar Jayramji Bhusari by giving assurance that he will give job in W.C.L. as he is having certificate of Project Affected Persons and no one from his family is willing to the job at W.C.L. as they are already having job in M.S.E.B. and MAHAGENCO. 6.

The learned Counsel for the applicant has stated that the complainant was introduced through Kalyani Jaipurkar. The crime is also registered against her. The amount was transferred in her account. She was protected by granting anticipatory bail by the Sessions Court. The applicant is the son of Waman Dambhare. He

2 6.aba.869.25 has not played any role. As the other co-accused namely Kalyani Jaipurkar is already protected, he prayed to protect the applicant by granting anticipatory bail.

7.

Heard the learned Counsel for the applicant and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

8.

The assurance of giving job was given by the father of the applicant. Considering that only an amount of Rs.50,000/- transferred in the account of the applicant and one offence is registered, which is disclosed by this applicant, the applicant is protected by granting ad interim . Accordingly, I pass following order: i] It is directed that in the event of arrest of the applicant in connection with Crime No.588/2025 registered with Police Station Umred, District Nagpur for the offences punishable under Sections 406, 420 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, he shall be released on bail on furnishing P.R. Bond in the sum of Rupees Twenty Five Thousand with one solvent surety in the like amount.

ii] The applicant shall not in any way tamper with the prosecution evidence.

iii] The applicant shall not pressurize or threaten the prosecution witnesses.

iv] The applicant shall attend the concerned police station on every Monday and Saturday between 1:00 p.m. to 2:00 p.m.

3 6.aba.869.25 v] The applicant shall co-operate the Investigation Officer.

The protection shall remain in force till next date.

(MRS. VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, J.) RGurnule Signed by: Mrs. R.M. MANDADE Designation: PA To Honourable Judge Date: 19/11/2025 17:08:46