Seema Virdhaval Shah v. State Of Maharashtra

KVM 1/2 18 - ABA 931 OF 2025.doc by KANCHAN VINOD MAYEKAR Date:

2025.04.09 17:52:18 +0530 KANCHAN VINOD MAYEKAR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 931 OF 2025 SEEMA VIRDHAVAL SHAH ..... APPLICANT

VERSUS

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ..... RESPONDENT Mr.Satyavrat Joshi a/w. Mr.Priyesh More for the Applicant. Mr.Amit A. Palkar, A.P.P. for the State.

CORAM : RAJESH S. PATIL, J.

DATE : 8th APRIL, 2025 P.C. :- The learned counsel for the applicant seeks liberty to add the first informant as party respondent no.2. Liberty as prayed is granted. Amendment to be carried out forthwith. It is made clear that if the amendment is not carried out, the anticipatory bail application will stand dismissed without further reference to this Court. 2.

Issue notice to the newly added respondent no.2, returnable on 21st April, 2025.

3.

The learned A.P.P. to serve the respondent no.2 through the Investigating Officer.

KVM 2/2 18 - ABA 931 OF 2025.doc 4.

Apart from the court notice, the applicant is also permitted to serve the respondent no.2 by private service, by all permissible modes of service and file affidavit of service before the next date of the hearing.

5.

It is submitted on behalf of the applicant that the applicant is a lady 66 years of age and was a nominee director of the company called as M/s.Sant Sevalal Nidhi Ltd.

[RAJESH S. PATIL, J.]