Swati Kirankumar Morey And ANR v. State Of Maharashtra Thr Pso., Ps Telhara Tq Akot. Dist. Akola

Diksha Rane 10 ABA 991-2025.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

by DIKSHA DINESH RANE Date:

2025.04.16 11:28:30 +0530 CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION DIKSHA DINESH RANE ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 991/2025 ATIQUR REHMAN KHAN AND ANR ..APPLICANTS VS.

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ..RESPONDENT ------------ Adv. Ganesh Gole a/w. Adv. Shirodkar Ateef for applicants. Mr. A. S. Shalgaonkar, APP for State.

Adv. Swapnil Sangle i/b. Adv. Ranjeet Yadav for org. Complainant. PSI P. M. Patil, Sakinaka Police Station, Mumbai. ------------ CORAM : RAJESH S. PATIL, J.

DATE : APRIL 15, 2025.

P.C. :

1.

The learned counsel for the applicants seeks liberty to add the informant as party respondent no.2.

2.

Liberty as prayed for granted. The applicants are permitted to add the informant as party respondent no.2 in the present proceeding. Amendment to be carried out forthwith. If the amendment is not carried, the anticipatory bail application stands dismissed without reference to this Court. The learned APP to serve the amended copy of the anticipatory bail application to the informant through IO.

Diksha Rane 10 ABA 991-2025.doc 3.

Issue notice to the newly added respondent no.2, returnable on 29/4/2025. Apart from the Court notice, advocate for the applicants are permitted to serve the newly added respondent no.2 by advocate's private notice by all permissible modes of service and file affidavit of service to that effect before the next date of the hearing. The learned counsel Mr. Swapnil Sangle waives service of notice on behalf of the newly added respondent no.2.

4.

Stand over to 29/4/2025 under the caption "for urgent circulation".

(RAJESH S. PATIL, J.)