Subodh Ratansing Patil v. State Of Maharashtra Thr Pso., Ps Khadan Tq. Dist. Akola

Diksha Rane 17 ABA 998-2025.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

by DIKSHA DINESH RANE Date:

2025.04.16 11:28:29 +0530 CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION DIKSHA DINESH RANE ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 998/2025 RAJARAM SUJAJI CHAUDHARI AND ANR ..APPLICANTS VS.

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ..RESPONDENT ------------ Adv. Pratik Shevale for applicants.

Ms. Pallavi N. Dabholkar, APP for State.

PSI Sneha S. Kharat, Chikhale Police Station (PCMC) ------------ CORAM : RAJESH S. PATIL, J.

DATE : APRIL 15, 2025.

P.C. :

1.

The learned counsel for the applicants seeks liberty to add the informant as respondent no.2.

2.

Liberty as prayed for granted. The applicants are permitted to add the informant as party respondent no.2 in the present proceeding. Amendment to be carried out forthwith. If the amendment is not carried, the anticipatory bail application stands dismissed without reference to this Court. The learned APP to serve the amended copy of the anticipatory bail application to the informant through IO.

Diksha Rane 17 ABA 998-2025.doc 3.

Issue notice to the newly added respondent no.2, returnable on 21/4/2025. Apart from the Court notice, advocate for the applicants are permitted to serve the newly added respondent no.2 by advocate's private notice by all permissible modes of service and file affidavit of service to that effect before the next date of the hearing. 4.

Stand over to 21/4/2025 under the caption "for urgent circulation".

(RAJESH S. PATIL, J.)