Suraj Gulab Tamboli v. State Of Maharashtra

912-aba-1013-2025.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1013 OF 2025 Suraj Gulab Tamboli ...APPLICANT vs.

State of Maharashtra and Another ...RESPONDENTS VISHAL SUBHASH PAREKAR ...

Mr. R.M. Haridas a/w. Mr. Mohan Kumbhar i/b. Mr. Dilip Shinde, Advocate for the Applicant.

Mr. Ajay Patil, APP for the State.

VISHAL SUBHASH PAREKAR Date: 2025.04.17 10:24:33 +0530 ...

CORAM

: RAJESH S. PATIL, J.

DATED : APRIL 16, 2025 P.C.:

1.

Mr. Haridas, appearing for the applicant seeks liberty to add the first informant as party respondent No. 2. Liberty as prayed is granted. Amendment to be carried out forthwith. It is made clear that if the amendment is not carried out, the anticipatory bail application will stand dismissed without further reference to this Court. 2.

Issue notice to newly added respondent No. 2, returnable on 28th April, 2025. Matter to come up under the caption of 'Urgent Circulation'.

3.

Apart from the Court notice, the applicant is also permitted to serve the respondent No. 2 by private service, by all permissible modes of service and file affidavit of service before the next date of hearing. Vishal Parekar, PS

912-aba-1013-2025.doc 4.

Stand over to 28th April, 2025.

5.

Matter to come up under the caption of 'Urgent Circulation'. 6.

Since Mr. Haridas has made a statement that the protection granted to the present applicant during the pendency of the pre-arrest bail application before the Sessions Court, no coercive steps be taken against the present applicant till the next date of hearing. (RAJESH S. PATIL, J.) Vishal Parekar, PS