Riyaz Faiya Inamdar v. State Of Maharashtra

KVM 1/2 912 - ABA 1103 OF 2025.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

by KANCHAN VINOD MAYEKAR Date: 2025.05.09 21:02:57 +0530 KANCHAN VINOD MAYEKAR CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1103 OF 2025 RIYAZ FAIYAZ INAMDAR ..APPLICANT

VERSUS

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ..RESPONDENT ALONGWITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1702 OF 2025 IN ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1103 OF 2025 INDRAJIT RAMKEWAL CHOUDHARY ..... INTERVENER

IN THE MATTER BETWEEN

RIYAZ FAIYAZ INAMDAR ..APPLICANT

VERSUS

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ..RESPONDENT Adv. Sundeep Singh for the Applicant.

Mr. Avinash A. Naik, A.P.P. for the State.

Adv. Mahesh Patil (Thr. V.C.) a/w. Adv. Tarun Sharma for the Applicant in IA.

CORAM : RAJESH S. PATIL, J.

DATE : 9th MAY, 2025 P.C. :- INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1702 OF 2025 IN ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1103 OF 2025 This interim application is filed by the original complainant.

KVM 2/2 912 - ABA 1103 OF 2025.doc The prayers made in this interim application cannot be granted. However, the applicant in the anticipatory bail application is directed to add the complainant as a party respondent no.2. Amendment to be carried out forthwith.

2.

Interim application is disposed of.

ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1103 OF 2025 3.

The learned counsel for the applicant submits that there is connected Anticipatory Bail Application No. 1100 of 2025 of the coaccused and the same matter is not shown on board inspite of earlier directions given by this Court. He further submits that during the pendency of the pre-arrest bail application before the Sessions Court, there was protection granted to the present applicant. However, after the same was decided by the Sessions Court, the said protection was not continued.

4.

Stand over to 9th June, 2025. To be shown alongwith ABA/1100/2025.

5.

In the meanwhile, till the next date of the hearing, no coercive steps be taken against the present applicant. [RAJESH S. PATIL, J.]