Surendrasingh Augadsingh Parmar And ANR v. The State Of Maharahtra

932-ABA-1178-2025.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.1178/2025 SURENDRASINGH AUGADSINGH PARMAR AND ANR ...APPLICANTS VS THE STATE OF MAHARAHTRA ...RESPONDENT ...

Adv. Samir Sarmalkar for the Applicants.

Adv. Avinash A. Naik, APP for the Respondent State. ...

CORAM

: RAJESH S. PATIL, J.

DATED : APRIL 29, 2025 P.C.:

1.

The learned APP submits that the names of the present applicants are not mentioned in any FIR. There was a complaint against the present applicants lodged by one Mr. Gangasagar Vankhede. He submits that the said complaint has been withdrawn. Therefore, there is no question of arresting the present applicants or to attend the police station for the purpose of inquiry.

2.

Mr. Sarmalkar, learned counsel for the applicants submits that the father of the applicant no.1 has lodged a complaint under section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act against Mr. Gangasagar Vankhede (proprietor of Akshay Plumbing).

3.

In my view, since, the APP submits that the police not Harish

932-ABA-1178-2025.doc going to take any steps of arresting the present applicants or calling them for investigation in complaint lodged against them, as the same has been withdrawn. Therefore, the anticipatory bail application does not survive for consideration and same stands disposed off. (RAJESH S. PATIL, J.) Signed by: Harish V. Chaudhari Designation: PA To Honourable Judge Date: 30/04/2025 17:24:30 Harish