Sudeep Mohan Nadig v. The State Of Maharashtra

Diksha Rane 921 ABA 1202-2025.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1202/2025 SUDEEP MOHAN NADIG ..APPLICANT VS.

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ..RESPONDENT ------------ Adv. Aniket Nikam a/w. Adv. Sunit Patil for the applicant. Mr. Anand Shalgaonkar, APP for the State.

------------ CORAM : RAJESH S. PATIL, J.

DATE : APRIL 29, 2025.

P.C. :

1.

The learned counsel for the applicant seeks liberty to add the informant as party respondent no.2 and also to enclose the copy of the order passed by the Sessions Court.

2.

Liberty as prayed for granted. Amendment to be carried out forthwith. If the amendment is not carried, the anticipatory bail application stands dismissed without reference to this Court. The learned APP to serve the amended copy of the anticipatory bail application to the informant through IO.

3.

Issue notice to the newly added respondent no.2, returnable on 5/5/2025.

Diksha Rane 921 ABA 1202-2025.doc 4.

Matter to come up under the caption "for urgent circulation". (RAJESH S. PATIL, J.) Signed by: Diksha Rane Designation: PS To Honourable Judge Date: 29/04/2025 22:09:40