Yogesh Shaligram Rahangadale v. State Of Maharashtra

Diksha Rane 958 ABA 1270-2025.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1270/2025 YOGESH SHALIGRAM RAHANGADALE ..APPLICANT VS.

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ..RESPONDENT ------------ Adv. Kuldeep Patil a/w. Adv. Saili Dhuru for applicant. Mr. A. A. Naik, APP for the State.

------------ CORAM : RAJESH S. PATIL, J.

DATE : MAY 9, 2025.

P.C. :

1.

The learned counsel for the applicant submitted that due to oversight the name of the present applicant is mentioned in the FIR. The pre-arrest bail application of the applicant is pending before the Sessions Court. There was ad-interim protection granted. He submits that the department of the applicant has already withdrawn the allegations made against the present applicant. The learned counsel for the applicant points out page 44 which is a letter written by the employer of the present applicant. In paragraph 2 it is stated that the name of the present applicant was mentioned due to oversight, therefore, they are withdrawing the allegations made against the present applicant.

Diksha Rane 958 ABA 1270-2025.doc 2.

Stand over to 3/7/2025.

3.

In the meanwhile, no coercive steps be taken against the present applicant till the next date of the hearing. (RAJESH S. PATIL, J.) Signed by: Diksha Rane Designation: PS To Honourable Judge Date: 09/05/2025 21:37:47