Dinesh Rajaram Patil v. State Of Maharashtra

917-ABA-1277-2025.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1277/2025 DINESH RAJARAM PATIL ...APPLICANT VS STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ...RESPONDENT ...

Adv. Chetan Deshmukh for the Applicant.

Adv. Anand S. Shalgaonkar, APP for the Respondent State. ...

CORAM

: RAJESH S. PATIL, J.

DATED : MAY 6, 2025 P.C.:

1.

Mr. Deshmukh, learned counsel for the Applicant submits that there is a video clip which shows that the allegations as made in the FIR are false. He submits that though there are two antecedents one under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code and another under Section 326 of the Indian Penal Code, the allegations made against the present applicant in the present crime are not true.

2.

The learned APP submits that the investigating officer is not present today. He submits that he needs to take instructions from the investigating officer therefore, short accommodation may be granted.

3.

Stand over to 7 May 2025.

(RAJESH S. PATIL, J.) Signed by: Harish V. Chaudhari Designation: PA To Honourable Judge Date: 06/05/2025 19:53:47 Harish