Satish Jayantilal Khimawat v. State Of Maharashtra And ANR

KVM 1/2 905 - ABA 1321 OF 2025.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

by KANCHAN VINOD MAYEKAR Date: 2025.05.09 18:39:26 +0530 KANCHAN VINOD MAYEKAR CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1321 OF 2025 SATISH JAYANTILAL KHIMAWAT ..... APPLICANT

VERSUS

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ANR.

..... RESPONDENTS Adv. Hrituraj Singh for the Applicant.

Ms. Pallavi N. Dabholkar, A.P.P. for the State. Adv. Ashray Dave i/b. Adv.P. R. Dave for the Intervener/Original Complainant.

Mr.Pradip Lad, A.P.I., Dongri Police Station. CORAM : RAJESH S. PATIL, J.

DATE : 9th MAY, 2025 P.C. :- Mr. Mishra, the learned counsel for the applicant submits that the demand draft of Rs. 10 Lakhs which is to be deposited with the Registry of this Court will be done during the course of the day. As far as the balance amount of Rs.35 Lakhs is concerned, an undertaking to that effect could not be filed today since the applicant is in Ahmedabad. Mr.Mishra requests that the matter be kept on 13th May, 2025 under the caption of 'Directions'.

2.

By consent of learned counsel for both the parties, stand over to

KVM 2/2 905 - ABA 1321 OF 2025.doc 13th May, 2025 (Vacation Court) under the caption of 'Directions'. 3.

In the meanwhile, no coercive steps be taken against the present applicant till the next date of the hearing.

4.

Time to carry out amendment by adding the complainant as party respondent no.3 is permitted. Amendment to be carried out forthwith.

[RAJESH S. PATIL, J.]