Santosh Tukaram Gaikwad v. The State Of Maharashtra

KVM 1/1 982 - ABA 1322 OF 2025.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

by KANCHAN VINOD MAYEKAR Date: 2025.05.09 13:54:59 +0530 KANCHAN VINOD MAYEKAR CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1322 OF 2025 SANTOSH TUKARAM GAIKWAD ..... APPLICANT

VERSUS

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ..... RESPONDENT Adv. Raviraj Paramand a/w. Adv. Deva Shinde for the Applicant. Ms. Supriya Kak, A.P.P. for the State.

Mr. V. V. Dhurve, P.S.I., Alephata Police Station, Pune Rural present. CORAM : RAJESH S. PATIL, J.

DATE : 8th MAY, 2025 P.C. :- This anticipatory bail application is the third application filed by the present applicant on the ground that there is change in circumstances as now the charge-sheet has been filed. 2.

The Supreme Court in case of Virupakshappa Goud & Anr. vs. The State of Karnataka & Anr. reported in (2017) 4 SCR 373, has held that filing of the charge-sheet cannot be the ground of filing the anticipatory bail application.

3.

The present anticipatory bail application stands rejected. [RAJESH S. PATIL, J.]