Pinky Sushil More v. State Of Maharashtra

12.aba1420.25.doc HEMANT CHANDERSEN SHIV

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION HEMANT CHANDERSEN SHIV Date: 2025.05.23 19:09:15 +0300 CR. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1420 OF 2025 Pinky Sushil More ...Applicant

Versus

State of Maharashtra

...Respondent

__________ Mr. Nikhil Mishra with Shravan Purohit for the Applicant. Ms. Shilpa G. Talhar, APP for the Respondent-State. Ms. Geetanjali Dutta with Ms. Shweta R. Rathod i/b Elixir Legal Services for the first informant.

__________ CORAM :

SHYAM C. CHANDAK, J.

DATE :

23rd MAY 2025 (VACATION COURT) P.C.:

.

Ms.Geetanjali Datta, learned Advocate intends to intervene in the Application on behalf of the first informant. 2) Mr.Mishra, learned Advocate for the Applicant, therefore, seeks leave to amend the Application to add the first informant as partyRespondent No.2. 3) Leave to amend is granted. Amendment to be carried out forthwith.

4) Issue notice to the Respondents, returnable on 9th June 2025.

5) Ms.Talhar, learned APP waives service on behalf of Respondent No.1-State.

H.C. SHIV

12.aba1420.25.doc 6) Ms.Dutta, learned Advocate waives service on behalf of Respondent No.2.

7) Ms.Dutta, learned Advocate seeks time to file reply and undertakes to file the Vakalatnama within one week from today. Said statement is accepted as and undertaking to the Court. (SHYAM C. CHANDAK, J.) H.C. SHIV