Pulin Bole v. State Of Maharashtra

Prasad Rajput IN IN THE THE HIGH HIGH COURT COURT OF OF JUDICATURE JUDICATURE AT AT BOMBAY BOMBAY CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION

8. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.1765 OF 2025 Pulin Bole .. Applicant

Versus

State of Maharashtra .. Respondent WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.2387 OF 2025 IN ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.1765 OF 2025 Ruchi Shah .. Applicant

IN THE MATTER BETWEEN:

Pulin Bole .. Applicant

Versus

State of Maharashtra .. Respondent WITH ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.1766 OF 2025 Shivani Varma .. Applicant

Versus

State of Maharashtra .. Respondent WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.2384 OF 2025 IN ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.1766 OF 2025 Ruchi Shah .. Applicant

IN THE MATTER BETWEEN:

Shivani Varma .. Applicant

Versus

State of Maharashtra .. Respondent

9. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.1804 OF 2025 Shobhit Rajan .. Applicant

Versus

State of Maharashtra .. Respondent

WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.2424 OF 2025 IN ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.1804 OF 2025 Ruchi Shah .. Applicant

IN THE MATTER BETWEEN:

Shobhit Rajan .. Applicant

Versus

State of Maharashtra .. Respondent ....................

 Dr. Ashwani Kumar, Senior Advocate a/w Mr. Virag Gupta, Mr. Shourya Tivari, Mr. Abhay Dhadiwal and Ms. Vidhi Karia i/by Jaykar & Partners, Advocates for Applicant in ABA No.1804 of 2025.

 Mr. Aabad Ponda, Senior Advocate a/w Mr. Abhay Dhadiwal, Ms. Vidhi Karia i/by Jaykar & Partners, Advocates for Applicant in ABA No.1765 of 2025.

 Ms. Ankita Chaudhary, Mr. Abhay Dhadiwal and Ms. Vidhi Karia i/by Jaykar & Associates, Advocates for Applicant in ABA No.1766 of 2025.

 API - Manisha Dhekale, EOW, Unit 7, Mumbai.

 Ms. Sangita Phad, APP in ABA No.1804 of 2025  Dr. Ashvini A. Takalkar, APP for State.

...................

CORAM : MILIND N. JADHAV, J.

DATE : JULY 11, 2025 P. C.

:

1.

Heard. These matters are placed before this Court being the alternate Court since the Regular Court has passed "Not before me" order as informed by the learned Advocates at the bar.

2.

Dr. Kumar has briefly apprised the facts of the case. Mr. Merchant would submit that he has instructions to oppose grant of Anticipatory Bail to the Applicants. Ms. Phad, learned APP appears in ABA 1804 of 2025.

3.

Considering that the Court time is over today as per the roster timetable of this Court for hearing Anticipatory bail Applications, Dr. Kumar and Mr. Ponda persuade the Court to grant interim protection to the Applicants upto the next date due to apprehensions expressed by them. Hence, in that view, ad-interim relief in terms of clause (c) is granted to Applicants in all three matters upto the next date subject to the present Anticipatory Bail Applications being heard on 18th July, 2025.

4.

Considering the request made by the learned Advocates for the parties all above captioned Applications shall be heard together on the next date. Hence the common order is passed. 5.

Stand over to 18th July, 2025 at 11:00 am (F.O.B.). P.R. Rajput [ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ]