Piyush Chimanlal Shah And ANR v. State Of Maharashtra

605.ABA.1911.2025.ODT ARJUN RODGE

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1911 OF 2025 Piyush Chimanlal Shah And Anr.

...Applicants

Versus

State Of Maharashtra

...Respondent

WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 3390 OF 2025 IN ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1911 OF 2025 Shivnath Raghunathprasad Gaur ...Applicant

Versus

The State Of Maharashtra

...Respondents

Mr. Shambhu Jha, Afsar Ansari i/by Abhimanyu Yadav, for the Applicants.

Ms. R. V. Newton, APP for the Respondent - State. API. Anil Rajput,Shil-Daighr Police Station, Thane City is present. Mr. Aashim Khan, through VC for the intervenor.

CORAM:

MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.

DATED:

19th JANUARY, 2026 PC:- 1.

At the outset, Ms. Newton, learned APP points out that there are 3 antecedents and those antecedents have not been disclosed in the Anticipatory Bail Application. 2.

In view of the said position, Mr. Shambhu Jha, learned Counsel appearing for the Applicants in Anticipatory Bail 19th January, 2026.

605.ABA.1911.2025.ODT ARJUN RODGE Application seeks withdrawal of the Anticipatory Bail Application with liberty to file fresh Anticipatory Bail Application by giving all the particulars of the antecedents. 3.

He submits that however, for a period of one week, adinterim protection granted by this Court in this Anticipatory Bail Application by Order dated 14th July 2025 be continued.

4.

Accordingly Anticipatory Bail Application is allowed to be withdrawn and disposed of as such with liberty as sought.

5.

However, till 30th January, 2026 ad-interim protection granted by Learned Single Judge by order dated 14th July, 2025 in this Anticipatory Bail Application shall remain in operation.

6.

In view of disposal of the Anticipatory Bail Application, nothing survives in the Interim Application and the same is also disposed of.

(MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.) 19th January, 2026.