Priyanka Sambhaji Walke v. The State Of Maharashtra And ORS

Mamta Kale 50-aba-2160-2025.docx

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Anticipatory Bail Application No.2160 of 2025 Priyanka Sambhaji Walke ... Applicant versus The State of Maharashtra

...Respondents

with Anticipatory Bail Application No. 2163 of 2025 Sambhaji Dagdu Walke ... Applicant versus Digitally signed by MAMTA AMAR KALE Date:

2025.08.22 18:32:11 +0530 MAMTA AMAR KALE The State of Maharashtra

...Respondent

---- Mr Shashikant P Chaudhari a/w Ms Snehal S Chaudhari a/w Mr Pranot Pawar a/w Mr Pritesh Haridas Bodekar, for the Applicants in both ABAs.

Mr S V Walve, APP, for Respondent / State.

Mr Rahul Kadam, for the Intervenor in both ABAs. ---- Coram: R.N. Laddha, J.

Date: 22 August 2025 P.C.:

.

Heard the learned Counsel for the parties.

2.

The learned Counsel for the applicants seeks leave to implead the first informant as a party respondent to these applications. Leave granted as prayed for. Necessary amendment shall be carried out forthwith. After the amendment is carried out, issue notice to the newly added __________________________________________________ 22 August 2025

Mamta Kale 50-aba-2160-2025.docx respondent. Mr. Rahul Kadam, the learned Counsel waives service of notice on behalf of newly added respondent. 3.

By consent, stand over to 8 September 2025.

(R.N. Laddha, J.) __________________________________________________ 22 August 2025