Rohidas Damodar Undre v. State Of Maharashtra

SMITA JOHNSON GONSALVES JOHNSON GONSALVES Date: 2025.09.08 19:45:23 +0530

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Anticipatory Bail Application No.2248 of 2025 Rohidas Damodar Undre ... Applicant versus The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent With Interim Application No.3252 of 2025 In Anticipatory Bail Application No.2248 of 2025 Sandeep Dnyanoba Undre ... Intervenor In the matter between Rohidas Damodar Undre ... Applicant versus The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent With Anticipatory Bail Application No.2227 of 2025 Ramdas Shivram @ Shivaji Undre And Anr ... Applicants versus The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent With Interim Application No.3250 of 2025 In

Anticipatory Bail Application No.2227 of 2025 Sandeep Dnyanoba Undre ... Intervenor In the matter between Ramdas Shivram @ Shivaji Undre And Anr ... Applicants versus The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent ---- Mr Vikas Shivarkar, for the applicant in ABA/2248/2025. Mr Tejas Pawar, for the applicants in ABA/2227/2025, through VC.

Mr SV Walve, APP, for the respondent/ State.

Mr Sandeep Phatak, for the intervenor in both ABAs. ---- Coram: R.N. Laddha, J.

Date: 4 September 2025.

P.C.:

Interim Application No.3252 of 2025 In Anticipatory Bail Application No.2248 of 2025 And Interim Application No.3250 of 2025 In Anticipatory Bail Application No.2227 of 2025 .

Heard.

2.

For the reasons stated in the intervention applications, and no objection from the other side, the same are allowed in terms of prayer clause (a).

3.

The applicants in ABA to implead the intervenor as party respondent to these ABAs. Necessary amendment be carried out within one week from today.

4.

The interim applications stand disposed of accordingly. 5.

By consent, stand over to 6 October 2025. The earlier order not to take any coercive action against the applicants in the present crime shall continue to operate till the next date. (R.N. Laddha, J.)