Arvind Kumar Sachdeva And ORS v. State Of Maharashtra

24. ABA 2590-2025.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 2590 OF 2025 Arvind Kumar Sachdeva & ors.

..Applicants ANAND SUDHAKAR SUDAME

Versus

The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent Mr. Rizwan a/w. Turab Kazmi, Asadali Z. Mazgoanwala, S. Ali Kazmi, Sachi Chopra, Mr. Samarth Sharma, Ms. Tanvi Shah, Mr. Pranit P. Likhite & Mr. Tushar Khatri, Advocates, for the Applicants ANAND SUDHAKAR SUDAME Date: 2025.09.20 18:40:30 +0530 Mr. C. D. Mali, APP, for the Respondent - State Mr. Niranjan Pachupate, Advocate, for Respondent No. 2/First Informant Mr. Yuvraj Bansode, PSI, Wakad Police Station, Pune present CORAM : MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.

DATE : 20.09.2025 P. C.

1.

At the outset, Mr. Mali, learned APP states that as Anticipatory Bail Application is withdrawn before the learned Sessions Court, this Anticipatory Bail Application is not maintainable. However, learned Counsel for the Applicants states that as ad-interim protection has been rejected, the said Anticipatory Bail Application has been withdrawn before the learned Sessions Judge.

2.

Mr. Rizwan, learned Counsel for the Applicants states that in the facts & circumstances, the Applicants will implead the First Anand

24. ABA 2590-2025.doc Informant/Complainant as party Respondent No. 2. Leave as sought for is granted. Amendment be carried out forthwith. Re-verification is dispensed with.

3.

Issue notice to the added Respondent No. 2 returnable on 24.09.2025. Mr. Pachupate, learned Counsel for Respondent No. 2/First Informant waives service of notice on behalf of Respondent No. 2. 4.

Till the next date, no coercive steps be taken against the Applicants.

(MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.) Anand