Suraj Prakash Narute And ANR v. State Of Maharashtra
903-ABA-2891-2025.doc Arjun
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.2891 OF 2025 Suraj Prakash Narute & Anr.
...Applicants
Versus
The State of Maharashtra
...Respondent
Digitally signed by ARJUN VITTHAL KUDHEKAR Date:
2025.10.16 21:42:34 +0530 ARJUN VITTHAL KUDHEKAR _______________________________________________________________ Ms. Ekta Patil i/b Prashant S. Hagare, for the Applicants. Mr. S. A. Karmakar, APP for the Respondent-State. Mr. Ghanasham Jadhav, for the First Informant. P.S.I. Vijay Telkikar, Walchandnagar Police Station, District-Pune, present.
_______________________________________________________________ CORAM: MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.
DATED: 16 OCTOBER 2025 P.C.:
1.
Heard Ms. Patil, learned Counsel appearing for the Applicants, Mr. Karmakar, learned APP for the Respondent-State of Maharashtra and Mr. Jadhav, learned Counsel appearing for the First Informant. 2.
It is the main grievance of learned Counsel for the Applicants that the Criminal Bail Application seeking pre-arrest bail is filed on 15th September 2025 before the learned Additional District and Sessions Judge, Indapur at Indapur and the same is not yet decided. She further submits that the next date before the learned Sessions Court is 28th October 2025.
3.
On the other hand, Mr. Karmakar, learned APP and Mr. Jadhav,
903-ABA-2891-2025.doc learned Counsel for the First Informant strongly opposes granting any interim protection.
4.
Accordingly, in the facts and circumstances, the Anticipatory Bail Application is disposed of by passing following Order :- i.
The learned District Judge and Additional Sessions Judge, Indapur at Indapur is requested to decide the Criminal Bail Application No.295 of 2025 on or before 31st October 2025. ii.
Till 31st October 2025 no coercive steps be taken against the Applicant.
5.
It is clarified that this Order is passed just to ensure that the learned Sessions Court decides the Criminal Bail Application filed by the Applicant. It is further clarified that this Court has not expressed any opinion and all contentions are expressly kept open. 6.
Accordingly, the Anticipatory Bail Application is disposed of. [MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.]