Prem Jayram Chavan v. State Of Maharashtra

40-ABA-2906-2025.DOC

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.2906 OF 2025 Prem Jayram Chavan ...Applicant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra

...Respondent

Ms. Zubi Ansari i/b. Mr. Ritesh Thobde, for the Applicant. Mr. S. A. Karmakar, APP, for the Respondent-State. Mr. R. A. Yadav, API, Nanded City Police Station, Pune, present.

CORAM:

MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.

DATED :

17th OCTOBER 2025 PC:- 1.

At the outset, Ms. Zubi Ansari, learned Counsel appearing for the Applicant seeks leave to correct the prayer clause (b) of the Anticipatory Bail Application.

2.

Leave as prayed is granted. Amendment be carried out forthwith. Re-verification is dispensed with. 3.

It is the submission of Ms. Zubi Ansari, learned Counsel appearing for the Applicant that the Applicant has not been named in the FIR and on the basis of the statement of the co-accused, the Applicant has been tried to be implicated in the offence. Sonali

40-ABA-2906-2025.DOC 4.

Mr. Karmakar, learned APP seeks time to file affidavit-inreply. 5.

Let such affidavit in reply be filed on or before 7th November 2025.

6.

Stand over to 14th November 2025.

7.

Till next date, no coercive steps be taken against the Applicant.

[MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.] Digitally signed by SONALI MILIND PATIL Date:

2025.10.18 10:50:06 +0530 SONALI MILIND PATIL Sonali