Sameer Abdulhusein Lalani And Others v. State Of Maharashtra And Another

938.apl.1100.25 1/1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Criminal Application [APL] No.1100 of 2025 Sameer Abdulhusein Lalani and others vs. State of Maharashtra, through P.S.O. of Police Station Kalamna, Nagpur and another =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's Orders or directions and Registrar's orders.

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Mr. Sunil Manohar, Senior Advocate a/b Mr. Z.Z. Haq, Advocate for the Applicants. Mr. A.B. Badar, A.P.P. for Non-Applicant No.1/State.

CORAM

: ANIL L. PANSARE & M.M. NERLIKAR, JJ.

DATE : 6 th AUGUST, 2025.

Heard.

02.

The argument is that the civil dispute is being converted in the criminal proceedings. Non-applicant No.2, who has invested the amount and took over the control of the company, has now lodged report saying that the applicants had invited him to invest in the company and have not repaid the invested amount.

03.

Issue notice to the non-applicants, returnable 20th August, 2025. 04.

The learned A.P.P. waives service of notice on behalf of nonapplicant No.1/State. 05.

In the meantime, the applicants may furnish necessary details to the Investigating Officer, who shall consider the same as part of investigation.

06.

The learned Senior Counsel further submits that the Investigating Officer has for no good reasons seized all the bank accounts of the company run by the applicants as also their personal accounts. 07.

The Investigating Officer shall justify the said action by filing detailed reply before the next date.

(M.M. Nerlikar, J.) (Anil L. Pansare, J.) Signed by: Mr. Sandesh Waghmare Designation: PS To Honourable Judge Date: 07/08/2025 14:54:44 *sandesh