Ashok Kumar Joshi v. The State Of Maharashtra And ORS.
Gokhale
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 236 OF 2025 IN CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 3836 OF 2014 Ashok Kumar Joshi ..Applicant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
..Respondents __________ Mr. Kartik Garg for Applicant.
Mr. Vinit Kulkarni, APP for State/Respondent. __________ CORAM : SARANG V. KOTWAL & SHYAM C. CHANDAK, JJ.
DATE : 09 JULY 2025 PC :
1.
This matter is placed by the Registry for speaking to the minutes. In the title of the order dated 20.06.2025, the number mentions as 'Interim Application No.236 of 2025 in Writ Petition No.3826 of 2014'. The correct number of the writ petition is Criminal Writ Petition No.3836 of 2014. Therefore, the title of the order dated 20.06.2025 shall be corrected to read as 'Interim Application No.236 of 2025 in Criminal Writ Petition No.3836 of 2014'. Similarly, in the operative part also the writ petition number Digitally signed by VINOD BHASKAR GOKHALE Date:
2025.07.10 16:30:37 +0530 VINOD BHASKAR GOKHALE
be corrected as 'Criminal Writ Petition No.3836 of 2014' instead of 'Criminal Writ Petition No.3826 of 2014'.
2.
After corrections of these typographical errors, the corrected order be uploaded.
3.
Rest of the order shall remains as it is.
(SHYAM C. CHANDAK, J.) (SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.) CORRECTED ORDER DATED 20th JUNE, 2025 READS THUS:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO.236 OF 2025 IN CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.3836 OF 2014 Ashok Kumar Joshi .. Applicant vs.
The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
.. Respondents Mr. Subodh Desai, Senior Advocate with Kartik Garg for the Applicant. Mr. V. B. Konde Deshmukh Addl.P.P. for the Respondent-State. CORAM : SARANG V. KOTWAL & SHYAM C. CHANDAK, JJ.
DATE : 20th JUNE, 2025
P. C. :
1.
This is an Application for restoration of Criminal Writ Petition No.3836 of 2014 which was dismissed for non prosecution vide the order dated 18/01/2024.
2.
Learned Senior Counsel for the Applicant submitted that the Applicant was one of the accused in the subject matter. There were three others. The subject matter arose out of C.R.No.78 of 2012 registered with E.O.W. Unit-9. The other three accused had separately approached this Court and there Petitions were admitted, with interim relief.
3.
Learned Senior Counsel submitted that the original Advocates, who had filed this Writ Petition on behalf of the Applicant were under the impression that since the subject matter was common, this particular Writ Petition would be decided alongwith the admitted Petitions. Obviously, their belief was wrong but in that belief they did not get the matter circulated. The matter was listed before a Division Bench of this Court on 18/01/2024 and was dismissed as nobody had appeared for the Petitioner.
4.
Learned Senior Advocate submitted that the Applicant's case is on a better footing than that of the Petitioners, whose Petitions are admitted and pending before this Court. He submitted that in the
interest of justice this inadvertence may be condoned and the Petitioner be given an opportunity to put forth his case before this Court. He submitted that there was no specific interim order or ad-interim order operating in this particular Writ Petition when it was dismissed. Considering these submissions, in the interest of justice, we are inclined to allow this Application. Hence, the following order :- :: ORDER ::
i.
The delay of 318 days in filing this Application is condoned.
ii.
Criminal Writ Petition 3836 of 2014 is restored to its original file and be placed for admission before the appropriate Bench on 15/07/2025.
iii.
Application is disposed of.
(SHYAM C. CHANDAK, J.) (SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.)