Sarjil Abdul Sattar Pilpile v. State Of Maharashtra

Shubhada S Kadam 55-ia-325-2025-APEAL-64-2025 (CR).doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 325 of 2025 in CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 64 OF 2025 Sarjil Abdul Sattar Pilpile ... Applicant versus The State of Maharashtra .... Respondent Mr. Ankit Takle, Advocate for the Applicant.

Ms.Sangeeta D. Shinde, APP for Respondent-State. CORAM : SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.

DATE : 12th MARCH, 2025.

P.C. :

1.

By this application, the applicant is seeking suspension of sentence and bail during the pendency of appeal filed by the applicant. 2.

The applicant has been convicted for : offence punishable under Section 353 r/w. Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code 1860 (for short "IPC") and sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment of two years and to pay fine of Rs.5000/-; for offence punishable under Section 332 r/w. Section 34 of the IPC and sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment of three years and to pay fine of Rs.5000/-; for offence punishable under Section 504 r/w. Section 34 of the IPC and sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment of two years and to pay fine of Rs.1000/-; for offence punishable under Section 506 r/w. Section 34 of the IPC and sentenced to Digitally signed by SHUBHADA SHANKAR KADAM Date:

2025.03.15 14:09:44 +0530 suffer rigorous imprisonment of one year and to pay fine of Rs.1,000/-. SHUBHADA SHANKAR KADAM 1/2

Shubhada S Kadam 55-ia-325-2025-APEAL-64-2025 (CR).doc 3.

It is the contention of learned counsel for the applicant that the trial Court has granted bail and suspended his during the appeal period. During the trial, the applicant was on bail and he has not misused the liberty. Hence, requested to allow the application. 4.

The learned APP for respondent-State strongly objected to allow the application.

5.

I have heard both learned counsel.

6.

The maximum sentence imposed on the applicant is of three years. The trial Court has granted bail to the applicant and suspended his sentence during the appeal period. During the trial, the applicant was on bail and he has not misused the liberty. It may take time to dispose of the appeal.

7.

In view of above, the applicant's sentence is suspended and he is enlarged on bail, pending the hearing and final disposal of the appeal, on the following terms and conditions.

ORDER

i. The applicant be enlarged on bail on furnishing P. R. Bond in the sum of Rs.25,000/- with one or two sureties in the like amount.

ii.

The bail bond to be furnished before the Trial Court. Interim Application stands disposed of.

9.

All concerned to act on the authenticated copy of this order. (SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.) 2/2